Eficacia del aprendizaje híbrido en la educación: una revisión sistemática 2022-2025
Effectiveness of hybrid learning in education: a systematic review 2022-2025Contenido principal del artículo
El aprendizaje híbrido es un paradigma educativo novedoso en la educación, como resultado de la pandemia COVID-19, por lo que, el presente artículo analiza toda la evidencia científica publicada entre los años 2022 y 2025 sobre la eficacia del aprendizaje híbrido en educación, a través del rendimiento académico, la satisfacción y compromiso estudiantil. En cuanto a la metodología empleada, fue mediante una revisión sistemática, siguiendo las directrices de PRISMA 2020, que incluyó 25 investigaciones publicadas en la base de datos Scopus; como consecuencia los resultados indicaron que el aprendizaje híbrido mejora el rendimiento y la autoeficacia de los estudiantes, específicamente cuando se combinan métodos activos de aprendizaje y un soporte tecnológico adecuado; sin embargo, se identificaron barreras como la falta de formación docente y problemas tecnológicos que afectan este aprendizaje. Las conclusiones resaltan que el éxito del modelo híbrido depende de las necesidades específicas de cada disciplina y contexto educativo.
Hybrid learning is a novel educational paradigm in education, resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this article analyzes all scientific evidence published between 2022 and 2025 on the effectiveness of hybrid learning in education, through academic performance, student satisfaction, and engagement. The methodology used was a systematic review, following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, which included 25 studies published in the Scopus database. The results indicated that hybrid learning improves student performance and self-efficacy, specifically when active learning methods are combined with adequate technological support. However, barriers such as lack of teacher training and technological problems affecting this type of learning were identified. The conclusions highlight that the success of the hybrid model depends on the specific needs of each discipline and educational context.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Acosta-Gonzaga, E., y Ruiz-Ledesma, E. F. (2022). Students' emotions and engagement in the emerging hybrid learning environment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(16), 10236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610236
DOIGoogle Scholar
Algharbawi, F., y Al-Taii, A. (2025). Learning in a Hybrid Classroom Environment: Students' Opinions and Preferences. Educational Process: International Journal, 14(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.83
DOIGoogle Scholar
Ali, A. A., Alqarni, K., Migdadi, H. F., Aldosemani, T. I., y Alshraah, S. M. (2024). Addressing the challenge of hybrid learning environment in foreign language education: Training lecturers for blended teaching approaches. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(5), 1582-1594. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.32
DOIGoogle Scholar
Almuarik, G. S., y Alangari, M. A. (2024). "Till we meet again!": The Synchronous Hybrid Teaching of English in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 24(2), 291-318. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v24i2.668
DOIGoogle Scholar
Alwadood, Z., Halim, S. A., Bakar, S. A., y Noor, N. M. (2023). Assessing student perceptions on hybrid learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(3), 1582-1590. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.25126
DOIGoogle Scholar
Amirova, A., Zhumabayeva, A., Zhunusbekova, A., Arenova, A., y Nygymanova, N. (2024). Students' perspectives of a hybrid learning system in Kazakhstani higher education: A case study. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 11(2), 302-310. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i2.5546
DOIGoogle Scholar
Area-Moreira, M., Bethencourt-Aguilar, A., y Martín-Gómez, S. (2023). HyFlex: Teaching and Learning in a Hybrid and Flexible Way in Higher Education. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 26(1), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.1.34023
DOIGoogle Scholar
Asali-Van Der Wal, R. (2023). Assessment of Student Satisfaction with Distance and Blended Learning. Integration of Education, 27(2), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.111.027.202302.262-272
DOIGoogle Scholar
Awad A.B., Ahmed A.M.A., Nassar F.S., Abbas A.O., (2024). Sustainable hybrid education model and its relationship to academic achievement among postgraduate students in some Egyptian universities according to international quality standards. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8 (8), 6334. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.6334
DOIGoogle Scholar
Camacho-Zuñiga C., Salas-Maxemín S., Valle-Arce A.P., Caratozzolo P., Chans G.M. (2025) Toward a continuous learning educational model: insights from the experience of a Mexican private university, Frontiers in Education, 10 (1485034), https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1485034
DOIGoogle Scholar
Campbell, M., McKenzie, J. E., Sowden, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Brennan, S. E., Ellis, S., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Ryan, R., Shepperd, S., Thomas, J., Welch, V., y Thomson, H. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ, 368, l6890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890
DOIGoogle Scholar
Chervona L., Chornoivan H., Grynko O. y Myroshnychenko S., (2021). Implementation of the strategy of sustainable development in the model of critical theory of society and education system. E3S Web of Conferences, 277, 06005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127706005
DOIGoogle Scholar
Chamorro-Atalaya O., Sobrino-Chunga L., Guerrero-Carranza R., Vargas-Díaz A., Poma-Garcia C., (2024). Student satisfaction in the context of hybrid learning through sentiment analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 3 (2), 831 – 841. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26717
DOIGoogle Scholar
Chiu T. K. F., (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory, Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909.
DOIGoogle Scholar
Corzo-Zavalet, J., Yon-Alv, R., Icho-Yacupom, J., Somoza, Y. P., Andrade-Arena, L., y Vargas-Cuentas, N. I. (2023). Hybrid Learning in Times of Pandemic Covid-19: An Experience in a Lima University. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 13(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v13i1.36393
DOIGoogle Scholar
Delgado Ayllon, F. A., Robles Pinto, J. Y., Sandoval de Malky, S. V., y Agrela Rodrigues, F. de A. (2025). Aprendizaje Híbrido Y Desarrollo De Competencias. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(1), 1541-1560. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i1.15918
DOIGoogle Scholar
Eija, N., Sari, P.-S., Kristina, M., Tiina, T., Jonna, J., y Heli-Maria, K. (2024). The experiences of health sciences students with hybrid learning in health sciences education—A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 132, 106017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106017
DOIGoogle Scholar
El Messaoudi, M. (2024). The Impact of a Blended Learning Model on Undergraduate University Students' Digital Literacy Skills: Empirical Evidence from Higher Education. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(4), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.134.5
DOIGoogle Scholar
Essadki, S., y Fourtassi, M. (2024). Effect of Hybrid Learning on Students’ Academic Performance at the Higher Institute of Nursing Professions and Health Techniques of Oujda. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 14 (3), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48367
DOIGoogle Scholar
Fabula, J. B. (2023). Hybrid Learning Experiences of College Students with Special Education Needs. IAFOR Journal of Education, 11(3), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.11.3.02
DOIGoogle Scholar
Fakhri J., Sada H.J., Saputra M.I., Jamil S., Mursyidah D., (2023). Performing Hybrid Learning at Islamic Higher Education Institusions for Mitigating Learning Loss. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9 (2), 223 – 240. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v9i2.28874
DOIGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Cando, D. A., Mogollón-Gutiérrez, G., Chango-Muñoz, B. R., y Espinoza-Alvarado, G. L. (2024). Educación híbrida: impacto en el aprendizaje y adaptación de los estudiantes. MQRInvestigar, 8(3), 1517–1542. https://doi.org/10.56048/MQR20225.8.3.2024.1517-1542
DOIGoogle Scholar
Garrison, D. R., y Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
DOIGoogle Scholar
He, K. (2010). Hybrid Learning and New Development of “IT in Education” Theory. Springer Learning. 6248, 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_46
DOIGoogle Scholar
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., y Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2023). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.4). Cochrane. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
Hu, Z. (2024). Sustaining hybrid teaching as effective pedagogy at higher education institutions: Students' voices. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 29(2), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2024.2346149
DOIGoogle Scholar
Kubrusly, M., de Aquino, B. O. A., Simonian, T. S., do Nascimento Oliveira, M., y Rocha, H. A. L. (2024). Self-efficacy of medical students in a hybrid curriculum course (traditional and problem-based learning) and associated factors. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 412. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05394-2
DOIGoogle Scholar
Kurniawan, Y., Karuh, C. S. Y., Ampow, M. K., Prahastuti, M., Anwar, N., y Cabezas, D. (2022). Evaluation of hybrid learning in the university: A case study approach. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 3(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.28991/HIJ-2022-03-04-03
DOIGoogle Scholar
Li, K. C., Wong, B. T. M., Kwan, R., Chan, H. T., Wu, M. M. F., y Cheung, S. K. S. (2023). Evaluation of hybrid learning and teaching practices: The perspective of academics. Education Sciences, 13(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086780
DOIGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. J. (2023). University Students' Motivation and Engagement During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Lockdown, Isolation, and Remote and Hybrid Learning. Educational Psychology, 43(5), 512-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441231179791
DOIGoogle Scholar
Navío-Marco, J., Mendieta-Aragón, A., Fernández de Tejada Muñoz, V., y Bautista-Cerro Ruiz, M. J. (2024). Driving students' engagement and satisfaction in blended and online learning universities: Use of learner-generated media in business management subjects. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(1), 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100963
DOIGoogle Scholar
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., y Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
DOIGoogle Scholar
Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., y Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: A product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Lancaster University. https://research.tees.ac.uk/en/publications/guidance-on-the-conduct-of-narrative-synthesis-in-sytematic-revie
Quivio Cuno R., Caballero Cifuentes L., Gutiérrez Guadalupe S., Collahua Rupaylla V., Alegre Huerta J., Jaime Andia M., Huamán Hurtado J., (2025). Educación híbrida y sus efectos en el aprendizaje de la matemática en el nivel superior. European Public y Social Innovation Review, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1279
DOIGoogle Scholar
Ragni, A., Ippolito, D., Masci, C., (2024) Assessing the impact of hybrid teaching on students’ academic performance via multilevel propensity score-based techniques, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 92, 101824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2024.101824
DOIGoogle Scholar
Rahayu, W. P., Sulistyowati, R., Pratikto, H., Hidayat, R., Narmaditya, B. S., Zainuddin, Z., Indarwati, R. A. A. (2024). Using self-determination and expectancy theory to evaluate hybrid learning. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2303535
DOIGoogle Scholar
Salim, S., Prasetia, M. A., Bagas F., M., Rohman, F., y Abdurrahman, A. (2024). The Impact of Blended Learning an Educational Innovation as on Student Character Building in Islamic Religious Education. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(3), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a739
DOIGoogle Scholar
Teoh, S. H., Boon Zik Hong, J., Md Shamsudin, N., Singh, P., y Hartono, R. (2025). Students' engagement in a hybrid classroom: a comparison between face-to-face and virtual environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2301234
DOIGoogle Scholar
Tonbuloğlu, B., y Tonbuloğlu, İ. (2023). Trends and patterns in blended learning research (1965–2022). Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 11023-11048. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11754-0
DOIGoogle Scholar
Trotter, J., y Qureshi, F. (2023). Student perspectives of hybrid delivery in a transnational education context during Covid-19. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.10
DOIGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Liu, J., Jia, S., Hou, C., Jiao, R., Yan, Y.,. y Liu, X.-Y. (2024). Hybrid teaching after COVID-19: advantages, challenges and optimization strategies. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 587. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05571-4
DOIGoogle Scholar
Wannapiroon, N., Shawarangkoon, S., Chawarangkoon, C., y Kucharoenthavorn, A. (2023). Next Normal Education, Hybrid Learning Model for Active Imagineering Learning to Enhance Digital Innovator Competency. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 13(1), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1779
DOIGoogle Scholar
Wong, S., Ely K.; Weinschreider E.; Levy J.; Simanton E.; Netski D. (2025). Utilizing a Hybrid Faculty-Guided, Self-Directed Study Model to Teach Immunology to First-Year Medical Students. Medical Science Educator, 35, 1191–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02330-x
DOIGoogle Scholar