La gobernanza digital como instrumento para la promoción de la cultura de paz en la sociedad contemporánea
Digital Governance as an Instrument for Promoting a Culture of Peace in Contemporary SocietyContenido principal del artículo
La gobernanza digital emerge como un mecanismo fundamental para la gestión responsable de entornos tecnológicos en contextos de creciente conflictividad, desinformación y vulneración de derechos en espacios virtuales. El presente estudio tiene como objetivo analizar la gobernanza digital como instrumento para la promoción de la cultura de paz. Mediante un enfoque cualitativo, de tipo documental-analítico, se examinaron marcos normativos, políticas públicas y estrategias institucionales que regulan el uso responsable de tecnologías de la información y comunicación. Se analizaron cinco casos representativos: Estonia, China, Colombia, México y Guerrero, considerando población de documentos, políticas y marcos legales. Se utilizó análisis de contenido como técnica principal. Los resultados evidencian que la gobernanza digital contribuye significativamente a la construcción de espacios virtuales éticos e inclusivos, favoreciendo la cultura de paz mediante educación digital, protección de datos y prevención de conductas nocivas en línea. Se concluye que políticas de gobernanza digital integrales constituyen un factor fundamental para garantizar convivencia democrática en sociedades digitalizadas.
Educational planning is an essential component of pedagogical management in early childhood education, guiding the Digital governance emerges as a fundamental mechanism for the responsible management of technological environments amidst contexts characterized by escalating conflict, disinformation, and the violation of rights within virtual spaces. This study aims to analyze digital governance as an instrument for promoting a culture of peace. Employing a qualitative, documentary-analytical approach, the research examined regulatory frameworks, public policies, and institutional strategies governing the responsible use of information and communication technologies. Five representative cases were analyzed—Estonia, China, Colombia, Mexico, and Guerrero—drawing upon a corpus of documents, policies, and legal frameworks. Content analysis was utilized as the primary research technique. The results demonstrate that digital governance contributes significantly to the construction of ethical and inclusive virtual spaces, fostering a culture of peace through digital literacy, data protection, and the prevention of harmful online behaviors. The study concludes that comprehensive digital governance policies constitute a fundamental factor in ensuring democratic coexistence within digitized societies.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Becerril Velasco, J. C. (2018). Cultura digital. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 23(76), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmie.2018.01.001
Boulding, E. (2000). Cultures of peace: The hidden side of history. Syracuse University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650008426318
Castells, M. (2009). La era de la información: Economía, sociedad y cultura. La sociedad red (Vol. 1). Alianza Editorial. https://www.alianzaeditorial.es/libro/libros-singulares-ls/la-sociedad-red-manuel-castells-9788420668004/
Castillo, A. R. (2024). La Cultura de Paz en la Era Digital: Examina cómo las Tecnologías Digitales Pueden ser Utilizadas para Promover la Paz y Prevenir Conflictos. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(1), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i1.10000
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199750804.001.0001
Coleman, S. (2005). New mediation and direct representation: Reconceptualizing representation in the digital age. New Media & Society, 7(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444805050745
Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe. (2022). Transformación digital y desarrollo sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/47939
Couldry, N., y Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609449
De Almeida, P. G. R., Dos Santos, C. D., y Farias, J. S. (2021). Artificial intelligence regulation: a framework for governance. Information Technology & Tourism, 23, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09593-z
Deibert, R. J. (2015). Cyber security as a field of study. En BlackCode: Inside the battle for cyberspace (pp. 15-30). McClelland & Stewart. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/223637/black-code-by-ronald-j-deibert/9780771025335
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296453.001.0001
Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. European Commission Joint Research Centre. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC83167
Floridi, L. (2014). The 4th revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606726.001.0001
Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270066
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301
García, M., Pérez, J., & Rodríguez, L. (2023). Competencias digitales para la ciudadanía en la educación rural en el posacuerdo colombiano. Revista Ixaya, 24, 45-67. https://doi.org/10.32870/ixaya.v0i24.7846
Hubbard, S., y Garcia, C. (2025). A framework for digital civic infrastructure. Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, Harvard Kennedy School. https://ash.harvard.edu/resources/a-framework-for-digital-civic-infrastructure/
Jiménez, F. (2011). Racionalidad pacífica: Una introducción a los estudios para la paz. Revista de Cultura de Paz, 1(1), 5–21. https://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/revpaz/article/view/5602
Lessig, L. (2006). Code: And other laws of cyberspace, version 2.0. Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-0638
Livingstone, S., y Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335
Madise, Ü., y Martens, T. (2006). E-voting in Estonia 2005. The first practice of country-wide binding Internet voting in the world. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Electronic Voting Technology Workshop, 1–10. https://www.vestforsk.no/sites/default/files/madise_martens.pdf
Martínez, C., y López, R. (2024). El Ethos digital en la Regulación Ética de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Gestión Pública. Revista Científica de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, 5(2), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.24133/recihys.v5i2.4090
Milan, S. (2013). Social movements and their technologies: Wiring social change. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313546
Morales-Acevedo, L., Sepúlveda-Rodríguez, A., y Peña-Melín, C. (2025). La gobernanza pública y tecnologías emergentes en la cuarta revolución industrial: Tensiones, oportunidades y dilemas en América Latina. Latin American Review of Business Studies, 1-18. https://labsreview.org/index.php/albus/article/view/43
Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. PublicAffairs. https://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/titles/evgeny-morozov/the-net-delusion/9781610391061/
Naciones Unidas. (2024). Pacto digital global: Anexo I del Pacto para el Futuro. Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. https://www.un.org/pact-for-the-future/es/annex-i-global-digital-compact
Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press. https://doi.org/10.1353/9780815703189
Omowon, A., et al. (2025). Technology and conflict resolution: Bridging online and offline solutions. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Adebobola-Omowon/publication/386282625_Technology_and_Conflict_Resolution_Bridging_Online_and_Offline_Solutions
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0273-8
Organización de las Naciones Unidas [ONU]. (2024). Pacto para el Futuro: Gobernanza digital y cultura de paz. Asamblea General. https://docs.un.org/es/A/79/573
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (1999). Declaración y programa de acción sobre una cultura de paz. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000115675
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2021). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455
Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. (2023). Redes sociales para la paz. https://www.unesco.org/es/articles/redes-sociales-para-la-paz
Palladino, N. (2025). Civil society's role in constitutionalising global content governance. Policy Review. https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/constitutionalising-global-content-governance
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/307922/the-filter-bubble-by-eli-pariser
Riverón, G. (2016). La cultura digital en la sociedad moderna. RITI Journal, 4(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36592/riti.v4i8.108
Sadat, A. (2025). Digital governance and civic inclusion to enhance public participation. Frontiers in Political Science, 7, 1671373. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1671373
Shirky, C. (2011). The political power of social media: Technology, the public sphere, and political change. Foreign Affairs, 90(1), 28–41. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2010-12-20/political-power-social-media
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400890521
Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society, 40(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/pjab004
Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid media activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315438177
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The network society (4th ed.). Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/the-network-society/book260215
You, Z., Wang, M., & He, Z. (2023). Residents' WeChat group use and pro-community behavior in the COVID-19 crisis: A distal mediating role of community trust and community attachment. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 16, 833–849. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S395625
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs. https://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/titles/shoshana-zuboff/the-age-of-surveillance-capitalism/9781610395694/