Modelo de evaluación del desempeño institucional para gobierno abierto en gobiernos regionales. Revisión sistemática

Model for evaluating institutional performance for open government in regional governments. Systematic review

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

El desempeño institucional de los gobiernos regionales es un factor determinante para la efectividad de la gestión pública. El objetivo de este estudio es proponer un modelo de evaluación del desempeño institucional para gobiernos abiertos en el contexto de los gobiernos regionales. La metodología empleada es una revisión sistemática de la literatura, con un enfoque cualitativo, siguiendo el protocolo PRISMA. Se analizaron estudios publicados entre 2022 y 2025, provenientes de la base de datos SCOPUS, de los cuales se incluyeron 22. Los resultados permitieron identificar cuatro dimensiones críticas del desempeño institucional y cuatro principios transversales de gobierno abierto, que se integran en el modelo propuesto (MEDIGA). Se concluye que el modelo MEDIGA, al articular estas dimensiones y principios, ofrece un marco robusto para la evaluación y mejora del desempeño institucional en los gobiernos regionales, promoviendo la transparencia, la participación y la colaboración.

The institutional performance of regional governments is a determining factor for the effectiveness of public management. The objective of this study is to propose a model for evaluating institutional performance for open governments in the context of regional governments. The methodology employed is a systematic literature review with a qualitative approach, following the PRISMA protocol. Studies published between 2022 and 2025, from the SCOPUS database, were analyzed, of which 22 were included. The results allowed for the identification of four critical dimensions of institutional performance and four cross-cutting principles of open government, which are integrated into the proposed model (MEDIGA). It is concluded that the MEDIGA model, by articulating these dimensions and principles, offers a robust framework for the evaluation and improvement of institutional performance in regional governments, promoting transparency, participation, and collaboration.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Valdiviezo Miranda , A., Valdiviezo Miranda , J., Villanueva Butrón , G. V., Madrid Villarreyes , C. M., & Álvarez Zapata , J. G. (2026). Modelo de evaluación del desempeño institucional para gobierno abierto en gobiernos regionales. Revisión sistemática. Revista Tribunal, 6(15), 883-900. https://doi.org/10.59659/revistatribunal.v6i15.438
Número
Vol. 6 Núm. 15 (2026): Tribunal. Revista en Ciencias de la Educación y Ciencias Jurídicas. Abril– Junio 2026
Sección
Artículos de Investigación
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.

Cómo citar

Valdiviezo Miranda , A., Valdiviezo Miranda , J., Villanueva Butrón , G. V., Madrid Villarreyes , C. M., & Álvarez Zapata , J. G. (2026). Modelo de evaluación del desempeño institucional para gobierno abierto en gobiernos regionales. Revisión sistemática. Revista Tribunal, 6(15), 883-900. https://doi.org/10.59659/revistatribunal.v6i15.438

Referencias

Alcaide Muñoz, C., Alcaide Muñoz, L., y Rodríguez Bolívar, M. P. (2023). Strategic alignment of open government initiatives in Andalusia. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(3), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523221086125
DOIGoogle Scholar

Alcalde, G., y Bazán, M. (2025). Policy capabilities for driving sustainable development: A comparison of two regional governments in Peru. Apuntes, 52(99), 191–230. https://doi.org/10.21678/apuntes.99.2250
DOIGoogle Scholar

Aldana-Heredia, W. I., y Zamudio-Rojas, R. E. (2025). Territorial governance in health in Peru: Challenges and opportunities of the national multisectoral policy 2025. TPM Testing Psychometrics Methodology in Applied Psychology, 32(S2), 1266–1280. https://tpmap.org/submission/index.php/tpm/article/view/684

Alshawabkeh, F., y Al Jaasmi, K. (2025). The role of modern technology in administrative control governance: A legal analytical study of the impact of digital transformation on administrative efficiency. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 7(3), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv7i3p12
DOIGoogle Scholar

Altobelli, L. C. (2024). Good management practice is correlated with good performance of community-engaged primary health care facilities in Peru. Global Health Science and Practice, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00402
DOIGoogle Scholar

Ardanaz, M., Scartascini, C., y Tommasi, M. (2016). Political institutions, policymaking processes, and policy outcomes in Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank.https://publications.iadb.org/en/political-institutions-policymaking-processes-and-policy-outcomes-latin-america (publications.iadb.org in Bing)

Arif, M. R., Md Kassim, A. A., Omsa, S., Triana, D., Annisa, y Danduru, A. F. (2025). Identifying governance contextual dimensions in Indonesia regional government-owned enterprises. Eastern European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(13), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.318560
DOIGoogle Scholar

Aroyo-Laguna, J. (2017). Has decentralization had an important effect on the development of the regions? The Peruvian case 2002-2015. Reforma y Democracia, 69, 159–190. https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n69.a145
DOIGoogle Scholar

Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., y Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
DOIGoogle Scholar

Barrios, F. (2017). The impact of the recent regionalization reforms in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia: Concepts and processes. Geopolitica(s), 8(1), 51–89. https://doi.org/10.5209/GEOP.53038
DOIGoogle Scholar

Bland, G., y Chirinos, L. A. (2014). Democratization through contention? Regional and local governance conflict in Peru. Latin American Politics and Society, 56(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2014.00223.x
DOIGoogle Scholar

Carter, C. L. (2020). Party system erosion: Evidence from Peru. Party Politics, 26(5), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818793915
DOIGoogle Scholar

Charles, V., Diaz, J., y Aparicio, J. (2022). The performance of regional governments under the results-based budgeting framework: A two-stage sectorial analysis. RAIRO Operations Research, 56(2), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022012
DOIGoogle Scholar

Coaquira, M., Tudela, J., y Jiménez, M. (2022). Regional comparative evaluation: Synthetic regional development index (RDI) for Peru. Economic Research Guardian, 12(2), 72–96. https://www.ecrg.ro/files/p2022.12(2)4y1.pdf

Cotrina, E., Gárate, J., Contreras, R., del Pilar P., y Maldonado, A. (2025). Analysis of the relationship between municipal management and service delivery in local government. Revista Lasallista de Investigacion, 22(1), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.22507/rli.v22n1a3664
DOIGoogle Scholar

Criado, J. (2016). Public administration in the open government age. Smart governance for a paradigm shift in public management. Revista de Estudios Politicos, 173, 245–275. https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rep.173.07
DOIGoogle Scholar

de Araújo, S., y de Freitas, R. (2025). Regulations for the ethical and safe use of artificial intelligence in healthcare. Revista de Direito Sanitario, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9044.rdisan.2025.232489
DOIGoogle Scholar

Eaton, K. (2025). Electing governors: Complexities of institutional design in Latin America's unitary countries. World Development, 196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107186
DOIGoogle Scholar

Escobar, K., Terry, O., Zavaleta, W., y Zárate, G. (2021). Performance of subnational governments in public investment management, Peru. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 26(95), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.19052/rvgluz.27.95.10
DOIGoogle Scholar

Ferdous, J., Foyjul-Islam, M., y Das, R. C. (2022). Dynamics of citizens' satisfaction on e-service delivery in local government institutions (Union Parishad) in Bangladesh. Journal of Community Positive Practices, 22(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.35782/JCPP.2022.2.08
DOIGoogle Scholar

García, R., Shiraishi, C., Vallejos, C., Chiroque, P., Maldonado, A., Palacios, C., Romero, E., Álamo, H., Tovar, S., Uribe, J., Ruiz, D., y Vitela, M. (2023). Surgical care and trauma patients capacity in Piura, Perú - Cross-sectional study. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e1058
DOIGoogle Scholar

García, J., y Curto, R. (2018). Determinants of open data disclosure and accountability in Spanish regional governments. Reforma y Democracia, 70, 163–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.69733/clad.ryd.n70.a153
DOIGoogle Scholar

Gil-García, J. R., Gasco-Hernandez, M., y Pardo, T. A. (2023). Making sense of open government: A conceptual framework and ideas for future research. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 6(2–3), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvad005
DOIGoogle Scholar

Gutiérrez, E. (2021). Gobernanza y sostenibilidad en la pesca artesanal del Perú. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO). https://www.fao.org/3/cb4567es/cb4567es.pdf

Harrison, T. M., et al. (2012). Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges and opportunities. Information Polity, 17(3–4), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0295
DOIGoogle Scholar

Hatry, H. P. (2018). Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Urban Institute Press. DOI:10.5040/9798216401759
DOIGoogle Scholar

Montero, M. (2024). Gobierno Abierto: Una Nueva Frontera para la Democracia. Editorial Tirant lo Blanch. https://helvia.uco.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10396/29227/gobierno_abierto_estrategia.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

Parycek, P., et al. (2016). Barriers to open government. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 19–28). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2910019.2910024
DOIGoogle Scholar

Ramírez-Alujas, Á. V. (2025). Open government as a public innovation ecosystem. Government Information Quarterly, 42(1), 101987. https://www.academia.edu/3013873/Open_Government_and_Public_Management_Modernization_A_New_Paradigm

Rekunenko, I., et al. (2025). Implementing Open Government: A Global Perspective. World Bank Publications. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/25150

Sánchez Ruiz, H., et al. (2025). Gobernanza y Salud en el Perú. Fondo Editorial de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. https://www.fondoeditorial.pucp.edu.pe

Schlager, E., y Villamayor, S. (2023). Frameworks for analyzing the governance of common‑pool resources. Cornell University Press. DOI https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501768744
DOIGoogle Scholar

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., y Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
DOIGoogle Scholar

OECD. (2022). First lessons from government evaluations of COVID‑19 responses: A synthesis. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1e4ebd7f-en
DOIGoogle Scholar

Velásquez, A., et al. (2023). Descentralización y desarrollo regional en Perú: Una revisión de la evidencia. Revista de Economía y Derecho, 20(78), 5–28.

Wirtz, B., Becker, M. y Langer, P. (2018). An integrated open government model. Information Polity, 23(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170411
DOIGoogle Scholar