Uso arbitrario de bienes privados por el estado como forma de confiscación: una revisión sistemática
Arbitrary use of private assets by the state as a form of confiscation: a systematic reviewContenido principal del artículo
El uso adecuado y transparente de la expropiación y confiscación es vital para proteger derechos, garantizar justicia y fortalecer la confianza ciudadana y jurídica. El objetivo de la presente investigación fue describir el estado de las investigaciones sobre el uso arbitrario de bienes privados por el estado como forma de confiscación. La metodología utilizada fue una revisión sistemática cualitativa, se seleccionaron 15 artículos comprendidos entre 2020 y 2025, usando el método PRISMA. Los estudios concluyen que la expropiación y confiscación, aunque con fines distintos, requieren equilibrar objetivos estatales y derechos fundamentales. Para evitar abusos, deben basarse en procedimientos claros, participación ciudadana y control judicial efectivo, especialmente en urbanización, desarrollo económico y lucha contra el crimen. La falta de armonización normativa genera inseguridad jurídica y desconfianza. Es esencial una regulación clara, compensación justa y estándares probatorios estrictos. Persisten desafíos en su aplicación, destacando la necesidad de innovar mecanismos y fortalecer la capacitación para evitar prácticas arbitrarias.
The appropriate and transparent use of expropriation and confiscation is vital to protecting rights, ensuring justice, and strengthening citizen and legal trust. The objective of this research was to describe the state of research on the arbitrary use of private property by the state as a form of confiscation. The methodology used was a qualitative systematic review, selecting 15 articles from 2020 to 2025 using the PRISMA method. The studies conclude that expropriation and confiscation, although for different purposes, require a balance between state objectives and fundamental rights. To avoid abuse, they must be based on clear procedures, citizen participation, and effective judicial oversight, especially in urbanization, economic development, and the fight against crime. The lack of regulatory harmonization generates legal uncertainty and mistrust. Clear regulations, fair compensation, and strict evidentiary standards are essential. Challenges persist in their application, highlighting the need to innovate mechanisms and strengthen training to prevent arbitrary practices.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Cómo citar
Referencias
Backer, D. I. y Cyna, E. (2025). Critical school finance. Journal of Educational Administration History, 57(1), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2024.2357774
Barrêtto, A. (2024). From Protection of Property to a Useless Distinction: The Concepts of Public Utility and Public Necessity (Utilidade e Necessidade Publica) in the Brazilian Law of Expropriation (1826-1941). Rev. Faculdade Direito Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, 84, 45-72. https://doi.org/10.12818/p.0304-2340.2024v84p45
Coruhlu, Y. E., Uzun, B. y Yildiz, O. (2020). Zoning plan-based legal confiscation without expropriation in Turkey in light of ECHR decisions. Land use policy, 95, 104598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104598
Egger, P., Pirotte, A. y Titi, C. (2023). International investment agreements and foreign direct investment: A survey. The World Economy, 46(6), 1524-1565. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13429
Esberg, J. y Perlman, R. (2023). Covert Confiscation: How Governments Differ in Their Strategies of Expropriation. Comparative Political Studies, 56(1), 3-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140221089650
Filipson, K. Y. y Riábinin, N. A. (2020). Particularities of the protection of subjective rights during the confiscation of property. Boletín de la Universidad de San Petersburgo del Ministerio del Interior de Rusia, 4(88), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.3575072071-8284-2020-4-54-61
Garaba, M. (2024). Extended confiscation in light of property law. Prevenirea şi combaterea criminalităţii: probleme, soluţii şi perspective, Moldavia. https://ibn.idsi.md/vizualizare_articol/207733.
García, H. A. (2021). Legal Experiments for Development in Latin America: Modernization, Revolution and Social Justice. Routledge Focus. https://n9.cl/nry5o
Ginzburg, Y. y Khashchina, E. (2020). Public needs as condition for limitating private property right to land. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Administratio Locorum, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.5724
Gorbachev, I. S. (2022). The evolution of the legislative regulation of the confiscation of property in the domestic legal system. Journal: Bulletin of kemerovo state university. Series: Humanities and social sciences, 6(3), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2022-6-3-255-262
King, C. (2022). EU developments in non-conviction-based confiscation. Criminal Law Justice in the European Union, 105-120. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4361086
Majeda, D. y Lamine, S. M. (2024). Methods of state acquisition of private property under law no. 23-17 and its impact on the principles of legal security. Journal of Law Sustainable Development, 12(8), e3888-e3888. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i8.3888
Merdović, B., Numanović, K. S. y Dragojlović, J. (2023). Confiscation of property obtained from a criminal offense as a measure to fight against organized crime. Култура полиса, 20(1), 87-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.51738/Kpolisa2023.20.1r.87msnd
Novogrodsky, N. B. y Fox, G. H. (2023). Of Looting, Land and Loss: The New International Law of Takings. Forthcoming in(65), 1. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4599622
Pavlidis, G. (2022). Asset recovery in the European Union: implementing a “no safe haven” strategy for illicit proceeds. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(1), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2020-0131
Prica, M. (2020). Expropriation in a Material sense. Зборник радова Правног факултета у Нишу, 89, 139-160. https://doi.org/10.5937/ZRPFN0-29394
Prislan, V. (2021). Judicial Expropriation in International Investment Law. International Comparative Law Quarterly, 70(1), 165-195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589320000445
Razvan-Iuliu, G. y Cosmin, P. S. (2022). Expropriation for Public Utility. Comparative Law Aspects. Fac. Drept Oradea(2), 153-169. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1291444
Riffel, C. (2022). Indirect Expropriation and the Protection of Public Interests. International Comparative Law Quarterly, 71(4), 945-974. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589322000343
Rozenfelds, J. (2023). Termination of ownership rights by way of confiscation and public reliability of the land register in Latvia. Revista Nueva realidad jurídica, 410-419. https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.8.2.28
Sladic, L. (2023). Confiscation of a vehicle in misdemeanor proceedings in Republika Srpska. Collection Papers Fac. L. Nis, 98, 237. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn1-44547
Sulastri, L., Efendi, B. y Gumilar, G. (2023). The Politics of Asset Confiscation Law in Indonesia. Lex Publica, 10(1), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.10.1.2023.43-65
Teeple, G. (2024). The law and judiciary. In: The democracy that never was Marx, Engels, and marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68020-5_9
Tsvetkovska, M. (2022). Legal characteristics of the act for alienation of property-private property for state and municipal needs. Conference proceedings of the national round table, https://doi.org/10.36997/PPDD2022.173
Wycichowski-Kuchta, G. (2025). Argumentation and Discourse of Polish Constitutional Tribunal Case-Law on Reprivatisation of Warsaw Real-Estate. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 38(3), 1093-1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10240-1
Yangonzela, D. (2023). The Right of Access to Public Information: Human Rights Issues, Transparency and Good Governance. Constitutionale, 4(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.25041/constitutionale.v4i1.2601
Yermekbayev, B. A. y Akmalov , K. A. (2023). Guarantee of personal rights and legal interests during search or seizure. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 3(4), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.ccj.3.4./CTWS3355
You, W., Dai, T., Du, W. y Chen, J. (2022). Special sacrifice and determination of compensation standard for land expropriation in the urbanization process—A perspective of legal practice. Sustainability, 14(19), 12159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912159
Yurkevych, Y. M., Krasnytskyi, I. V., Krupnyk, R. V., Hrushchynska, N. I. y Petronchak, Y. O. (2020). Problems of Multidisciplinary Regulation of Confiscation of Property in Ukraine in the Conditions of European Integration Processes. International Journal of Criminology Sociology, 9, 3157-3165. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.382